I certainly am still hereZep wrote:What, you still here?
1) Evidence that I have dismissed anything. As I said, if you have anything else to dispel this POV, bring it on. We're waiting... So far your evidence has been absolutely pathetic, if not zero, for your own scenario(s). You need to pick up your game on that.
2) Change the NIST report wording! Wow. That means it must be wrong if they change the wording. They can't possibly be making it more accurate with each revision or anything like that, could they. Your argument also means all dictionaries are completely wrong - they keep changing those all the time too, you know, on a regular basis. :wry
3) Ah, I see where you're coming from now...
4) Yes, George Bush Senior is indeed a lizard-king. He stole the elections once for himself and twice for his nitwit offspring by poisoning election officials with hallucinogens to make them count the votes incorrectly. "Hanging chads" are not just voting card issues but a veiled reference to how they will deal with recalcitrant election officials once the FEMA deathcamps get started up. Any time now... Also Queen Elizabeth II is a lizard, and eats puppies for breakfast. The Duke of Edinburgh has been known to eat a polopony whole. The Dutch royal family had a secret tunnel dug under The Channel right beside the train one which they use to transport crates of cash, diamonds, drugs and dead dogs for the dinner table. 23-skiddoo, yer father's mustache. This all makes sense to you, doesn't it, roscoe?
5) If this is the quality of your "evidence" so far, your "warmed up" stuff will be truly amazing. I can hardly wait. :wry
To be honest I'm a little disappointed, JREF was a more challenging. At least they attempted to bring up counter evidence. Which of course I instantly blew away.
(1) Did you that ACARS from Flights 175 and 93 were still being received long AFTER they had supposedly crashed?
(2) How I remember the times when all you BOXCUTTER CONSPIRACY THEORISTS were all saying that the towers didn't fall at free free fall speed. How we all loved it when the 911 truth movement forced NIST kicking and screaming to state IN THEIR REPORT that the towers DID FALL AT FREE FALL SPEED. So any further comment from you Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists that the towers didn't fall at free fall speed we will instantly refer you to the OFFICIAL conclusion of what happened during the tower collapse.
(3) I'm coming from a hatfull of questions that need to be answered in a New Inquiry.
(4) Attention please. Could someone please return Zep's marbles. He/She/It is gibbering.
(5) Well I haven't started on the Pentagon attack anomalies yet. Nor on the recently released NEADS tape data.[